Nonpartisan. Oath-bound. We endorse no candidate and no party.

  • Become a field reporter for the 50501 Veterans flagship podcast, "The Smoke Pit." Apply Now

Back to Rumor Control

Share this ruling

Misleading: California counties sent voters duplicate mail ballots on purpose so people can vote twice.

California New

Some California voters did get two mail ballots, because of vendor printing errors, and only one ballot per voter will count.

The rumor: Misleading “California counties sent voters duplicate mail ballots on purpose so people can vote twice.”

The facts: San Luis Obispo County says its vendor processed a supplemental mailing twice, sending duplicates to 2,666 voters, and its registration system flags a second ballot from the same voter. Tulare and Imperial counties reported smaller printing errors. No evidence shows the mailings were intentional, and voting twice is a crime. If you got two ballots, vote one, destroy the other, and call your county elections office with questions.

How this story developed

  1. Influencer posts on X frame the duplicates as deliberate and tie them to noncitizen voting. Imperial County reports 160 duplicate ballots. No evidence the mailings were intentional.
  2. San Luis Obispo County says its vendor sent duplicate ballots to 2,666 voters and its system will count only one per voter. The Los Angeles Times reports thousands statewide.
  3. Tulare County Elections Office says a printing error sent duplicate ballots to some Tulare city voters and mails postcards telling them to destroy the extra ballot.

Sources

  1. KEYT: San Luis Obispo County explains 2,666 duplicate ballots, Oct 20 Other source Archived copy
  2. KMPH: Tulare printing error sends duplicate ballots, Oct 15 News report Checked Archived copy
  3. Los Angeles Times: thousands got duplicate mail ballots, Oct 20 News report Checked Archived copy
  4. The National News Desk via KMPH: Tulare and Imperial duplicates, Oct 21 News report Checked Archived copy
  5. UW CIP: no evidence duplicate mailings were intentional, Oct 22 Fact-check Checked Archived copy